by nailshooter41aol.com on Tue Nov 18, 2008 11:31 pm
On Nov 18, 9:45 am, "Swingman" wrote:
> Ridgid, Ryobi, Milwaukee, what's the difference?
Not much. Warranty mostly.
The guy I was talking to in the store said that Milwaukee is trying to
reach the serious DIY, semi-pro and pro guys with more affordable
tools.
Then he said they are upping the ante on the Ridgid tools by making
them better, with different guts than before and with more sturdy
designs. They are now actively seeking the pro market, and will leave
the DIY to Skil, Ryobi, and others.
So one is going up, and one is coming down on the quality scale.
I still can't get over the fact that the store has a large Hilti
display. These tools are priced in Festool's domain, perhaps a touch
south. Many are made in Switzerland, and seem well built, but
awkward.
Someone will lose rack space. You aren't going to have $450 cordless
drills in a big box stores for long. Especially when no one I know
that isn't in the trades has used Hilti tools.
> Actually, and judging from what I see on construction sites, a lot of Ridgid
> tools, though not the Ridgid of yore, still seem to be pretty * good,
> despite their now bastardized origin.
I think some are better. Their newer line of cordless drills are
supposed to be pretty good, and priced competitively.
> Witness my Ridgid planer, still trucking along after five or six years of
> use.
For about 5 years I used a 14.4 drill that was a Ryobi "Commercial"
brand that I bought at the old Builder's square. That drill was a
stud and was only used for roofing repairs and sheet metal work. It
worked great. It wasn't cheap like today's Ryobi tools, but it was a
winner.
You never know. I don't care anymore what color or name is on the
tools. I just want them to do what they advertise, in the manner they
claim.
Seems to be a trick to doing that, though. Perhaps explains why I was
so pleased with the little Li 12v drill. In reality, it just does
what it is supposed to do...
Robert